Two owners in Collingwood, Ontario, chose to reject an offer on their home because it came with conditions. The prospective buyer’s offer depended on the sale of the buyer’s current property. The sellers decided they did not want a deal tied to another house sale.
Instead, the owners moved forward with a different proposal that offered fewer strings attached. Even though this new offer came at a lower price than they had originally hoped for, the simplicity of the deal won them over. They accepted less money to avoid the risk associated with a conditional sale.
The house in question had carried an asking price of $1,799,000 when it went on the market in November 2024. Buyers who offer unconditionally—even at a lower amount—often appeal more to sellers who want certainty and a quicker closing process.
Homeowners often face a choice: hold out for a higher offer that comes with caveats or accept a firm deal at a lower number. In this case, rejecting the first offer meant prioritizing peace of mind over maximum return. It’s a trade‑off many sellers weigh, especially in markets where time and certainty matter.
While the exact accepting price wasn't disclosed, it was clearly lower than the original $1.8 million asking figure. For these sellers, a smooth transaction without additional hurdles trumped the lure of holding out for more money.
This situation underscores a simple truth in real estate: sometimes less is more. A clean, unconditional offer—even at a reduced price—can win the day when conditions could derail or delay a sale.